NEC voting recommendation
Many members of Young Labour will recently have received an email from the Chair of the Young Labour National Committee with a “let’s talk” questionnaire and contact details for many of the committee. Included as a ‘P.S.’ was a recommendation to vote for a slate of candidates in the NEC elections.
Supporters of ‘Young Labour Democracy’ feel this raises some important questions, the most pressing of which is whether as an official body of the party, Young Labour should be supporting candidates in internal elections. Whilst the recommendations were qualified as a ‘personal opinion’ there seems to have been no discussion amongst either the National or Executive Committees of Young Labour as to whether such support should be included in an official mailing, let alone if there was a consensus as to who to support. Where is the opportunity for other members, or the Committee as a whole to share their ‘personal opinion’ to large numbers of young members?
As the distribution list included many more than personal contacts of the YL Chair, who provided our addresses - Labour General Secretary Peter Watt has been told that the membership database wasn’t used, so what was?
In any case, shouldn’t YL have been encouraging a high turnout from young members in the NEC poll to represent our diverse political opinions, rather than a vote for specific candidates? A call for a high turnout in this highly contested election would put Young Labour in a strong position to work with whichever candidates are elected to the CLP section of the NEC, whereas now it is at least possible (if not almost a certainty) that the ruling body of our Party will have members whose presence has been actively opposed by Young Labour – something which is hardly an incentive for them to work with or help YL in the future.
This seems like the perfect example of why we need a proper system of accountability within Young Labour, with the Chair and other officers being accountable to the membership.
Supporters of ‘Young Labour Democracy’ feel this raises some important questions, the most pressing of which is whether as an official body of the party, Young Labour should be supporting candidates in internal elections. Whilst the recommendations were qualified as a ‘personal opinion’ there seems to have been no discussion amongst either the National or Executive Committees of Young Labour as to whether such support should be included in an official mailing, let alone if there was a consensus as to who to support. Where is the opportunity for other members, or the Committee as a whole to share their ‘personal opinion’ to large numbers of young members?
As the distribution list included many more than personal contacts of the YL Chair, who provided our addresses - Labour General Secretary Peter Watt has been told that the membership database wasn’t used, so what was?
In any case, shouldn’t YL have been encouraging a high turnout from young members in the NEC poll to represent our diverse political opinions, rather than a vote for specific candidates? A call for a high turnout in this highly contested election would put Young Labour in a strong position to work with whichever candidates are elected to the CLP section of the NEC, whereas now it is at least possible (if not almost a certainty) that the ruling body of our Party will have members whose presence has been actively opposed by Young Labour – something which is hardly an incentive for them to work with or help YL in the future.
This seems like the perfect example of why we need a proper system of accountability within Young Labour, with the Chair and other officers being accountable to the membership.